Skip to main content
Back to all twelve witnesses

Sworn witness · No. 02 of 12

Big Beak Brenda

Local apex predator (retired heron)

Sworn to corroborate Charge § 04.2 — the heron recants her loitering report

Sworn Affidavit

Sworn statement of Brenda, retired heron, filed to formally recant her own earlier loitering report. The witness testified from the reeds, at a respectful and legally-mandated distance from the other witnesses.

Let me be clear about what I am. I am a heron. I eat frogs. It's not personal, it's breakfast. In forty years on this marsh I have eaten a great many frogs and regretted exactly none of them. So when I tell you I filed a loitering report on PeePoo, understand that I filed it the way I file everything: fast, hungry, and without reading the pad twice.

But I have had time to reflect, and reflection is the enemy of a good appetite. The frog I reported for 'suspicious lily-pad loitering' was not loitering. He was sitting very still because he'd found a beetle on its back and was waiting to see if it could right itself before he decided whether to help. It righted itself. He cheered. Quietly. To himself. I have never in my career watched a frog cheer for a beetle. It put me right off my dinner.

I have since stapled a handwritten retraction to the back of my original report. It reads, in full: 'I would never eat PeePoo. He's too pure. Eat his brother instead. I'll pay.' I stand by every word. The brother — the one across the pond, the one I'm told I mustn't name — now there is a frog with the right amount of guilt in him to season a meal. Same face. Completely different flavor. A predator knows.

So strike my loitering report. It's the only witness statement in this whole file that got worse for the prosecution the longer I looked at it. I came here to eat a frog and I'm leaving having sworn to protect one. That's not a thing that happens to a heron twice.

Cross-Examination

Brenda, you filed the original report. Why should the court believe your retraction over your first sworn account?
Because the first one was written on an empty stomach and the second was written on a full conscience. I've never lied on either. I just wasn't paying attention the first time. Now I am.
You offer to pay to have the defendant's brother eaten. Isn't that a threat that undermines your credibility?
It's an offer, not a threat, and it's off the record now that you mention it. Strike it. Keep the part where I say PeePoo is too pure to eat. That part's forensic.
How do you distinguish PeePoo from his identical twin if you nearly ate the wrong one?
Smell. PeePoo smells like clean pondwater and good intentions. The other one smells like someone else's ladle. You can't fake a smell to a heron. We're built for it.
No further questions.
Pity. I was just getting my appetite back for the truth.

Testimony sworn, logged, and cross-examined. Original loitering report retained with retraction stapled behind it. Do not remove pins.

Back to all twelve witnesses

Enter it into the record

The apex predator recanted her report. That's worth a repost.

Every repost is another character witness. Every follow keeps the case in the record.